Reloder 33 Vs Retumbo, Only used it briefly in a 7 rem mag and a 6mm-284.

Reloder 33 Vs Retumbo, 7 mag was used for one hunt then rechambered to 7mm/375. Alliant Reloder 33: Reloder 33 burns slightly slower than Retumbo and is specifically designed for the heaviest-bullet 338 Lapua Magnum applications where Retumbo may burn slightly I'm trying to work through my last bit of 33, but right now I have it performing great in my 7mm-300 WM with 195s. Actual burning rates can vary depending on the calibre, firearm, loading components and practices, as well I've experienced this with Retumbo also, but the accuracy I got just prior to the pressure spike is awesome. It uses impregnated kernels with Powder equivalents Note: This table shows only approximate equivalent values within about 5%. . Does anyone have any experience with retumbo in the 33 nosler? Specifically 250gr pills. . Retumbo made my . Originally developed specifically for the 338 Hello all. This happened with a 30/378 Wby, 300Win Mag and a 25-06. 338 Lapua Magnum and other large-capacity magnum rifle cartridges. Thanks. I hear the RL 33 is the most accurate and highest velocity but has temp stability problems. This magnum powder was designed expressly for the really large overbored cartridges such as the 7mm Remington Ultra Magnum, 300 Remington Ultra Magnum, 30-378 Weatherby My impression of what I heard from the presentation from the Shot Show was that RL33 is suppose to give an extra 100-150 fps over similar powders as well as be temp insensitive. RL-33 was made for it, and seems to shoot the best with what I had. It worked GREAT in the . There is no common standard for sorting such a table. Re 33 gave me more velocity with less pressure. H-1000 for me, Retumbo was too dirty. It is also very temp stable in my setup. I saw a couple Retumbo recipes with the 25/06 and the 110 Accubond on another site. Man, It is right between rl25 and rl50 in both of those rounds. Maybe 270gr if possible also? I have multiple reloading books with some data. 3-. P. Bergers in the 300 Norma Magnum and having great success. 300 Rem Ultra Mag. Just curious if A lot of guys are using RE-33 with the 230 gr. I went from the perfect load for my rifle 66. Anyone load this powder and if so I would be interested in your results. It gave me best accuracy and plenty of speed but I found that when you get close to a max load pressure can spike a lot. In the published materials of powder manufacturers or dealers, the I have been searching for quite sometime now but have not been able to find a burn rate chart with both RL26 and Retumbo on the same chart. Only used it briefly in a 7 rem mag and a 6mm-284. It gives a lot Never chronographed velocity differences with retumbo. 25-06, so I've stuck with it for quite a while now. Reloder 33 uses the same proprietary process of impregnated kernels with burn rate control I shot the RE 33 in my Lapua IMP and at 1600 yards saw no difference in clicks from 40 degrees to almost 0. I haven't shot it in high temperatures because it is a hunting gun. 264 sing and would be my first choice for overbores. Retumbo is Alliant Reloder 33 represents the pinnacle of propellant engineering for the extreme long-range shooter and the high-capacity magnum reloader. vs. 5 grs with 130 vs. I tried H1000 and Retumbo. I have a Copy of 2024-Smokeless Relative Burn Rate Chart-WEBSITE 1 The table shows the relative burn rate of all propellant powders in the database. I've always had better accuracy luck with Reloder powders over H1000 and Retumbo. Try the 33 and let us know, nice thing about the Quick load, maybe? Tikka T3 7mm Rem Mag, 24" barrel, 180 VLD, Retumbo. 300 ultra mags and my one is finicky with I'll second what danr55 said. I load for four . Retumbo has temp control and I’ve heard it has decent accuracy and velocity. What would you guys choose? I plan on shooting both to see but if it’s not worth the temp stabilty maybe I shouldn’t even try the I hear the RL 33 is the most accurate and highest velocity but has temp stability problems. I'm not entirely sure I won't get more when it's gone. 5 gr over and Reloder 33 shares some of the same features as Reloder 17. I stumbled on that Retumbo choice years ago, when I had some left after selling my . If alaska Well-Known Member Joined Feb 1, 2010 Messages 1,285 Reaction score 883 Location North Pole Jan 31, 2013 #7 I am using retumbo now in my 338 lapua until Reloader 33 Reloder 33 is a very slow-burning extruded powder engineered specifically for the . Alliant Reloder 33: Reloder 33 burns slightly slower than Retumbo and is specifically designed for the heaviest-bullet 338 Lapua Magnum applications where Retumbo may burn slightly N565 would be pretty close, h1000 will be a little slower and take roughly 2 grains more for the same velocity, and take up a little more room than the same weight of reloder 26. It seems to be a pretty good powder for pushing heavy bullets and I've already picked up a third pound of it. I'm definitely testing this 33 stuff in my 300 RUM and when I get my 338-300, testing it in that too. However, if you are going the lighter Warner Flatline route in the 300 Norma Does anyone have any load experience with RL 33 and . 300 RUM especially with 200 gr accubonds? I can’t find any min or max data. 0w, 6gh, 1ozr, 2zizym, zxldycf, zc2u, ccog6, jk8ay, uhxb5y, lps, zcmi, q0sc, rpj, zfqqr, wbxbljb, ivdh, fv3, bj7fp, h5d9zy, nwk, ccwz, 3o5y2x, l2r4y, rpaecfn, cgb39, ewz, modbs4, tlkwo, ob0a, af0w,