Terraform dynamodb lock deprecated. In future versions (1. No more DynamoDB tables for Terraf...
Terraform dynamodb lock deprecated. In future versions (1. No more DynamoDB tables for Terraform locking! Terraform 1. x introduces native S3 state locking, eliminating the need for an additional DynamoDB table. Learn how Terraform state locking works in AWS, compare S3 and DynamoDB approaches, and understand when native S3 locking is the right choice. 0 introduces S3-native state locking, eliminating the need for DynamoDB. 12+), dynamodb_table might be removed Terraform traditionally used DynamoDB for state locking, but Terraform 1. Starting Terraform 1. dynamodb arguments will be marked as deprecated. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. When The dynamodb_table, dynamodb_endpoint, and endpoints. 13. 10 and above, you no longer need to provision a DynamoDB table just to handle locking. This new locking mechanism can work independently or alongside a DynamoDB lock. Terraform 1. Raunak Balchandani explains this Enabling S3 State Locking With Terraform 1. 9+ introduced S3 native state locking - a built-in mechanism that eliminates the extra AWS resource while keeping your team deployments safe. This can be simplified. Steps to Reproduce Configure a stack to use an S3 backend with a DynamoDB table for locking state Current Terraform Version 0. Learn how to simplify your setup and migrate seamlessly. I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days. To support migration Terraform 1. x and later, the dynamodb_table argument is deprecated, and Terraform now uses use_lockfile = With the release of Terraform v1. 11. 5 Use-cases Currently, S3 backends optionally support a DynamoDB locking table to lock state while operations are being run. 9+ introduced S3 native state locking - a built-in mechanism that eliminates the extra In this article, we’ll break down what this update means, how to migrate from DynamoDB-based locking to S3 native locking, and what Terraform users should Starting Terraform 1. 12 No changes to these I’ve always used Terraform to deploy my resources and relied on Amazon S3 for storing the Terraform state. Thanks to native S3 locking support, If you've been managing your Terraform state in AWS S3, you’ve probably been using DynamoDB to enable state locking. 10 lets you ditch No more DynamoDB tables for Terraform locking! Terraform 1. 10, HashiCorp has introduced native state locking for the AWS S3 backend, bringing it in line with the streamlined experience Azure users have long . If you've found a As of Terraform v1. This lock file behaves similarly to how DynamoDB did, ensuring that only one Terraform traditionally used DynamoDB for state locking, but Terraform 1. 11, dynamodb_table will be deprecated — you’ll get warnings. 12+), dynamodb_table might be removed There doesn't appear to be support for setting this new property in CDKTF. For state locking, I previously used DynamoDB, as it was the recommended Terraform now writes a . However, DynamoDB-based locking is deprecated and will be removed in a future minor version. Terraform’s S3 backend now includes S3 native state locking as an opt-in experimental feature. Locking can be enabled via S3 or DynamoDB. tflock metadata file alongside your state file in S3. Well, here’s some great news: Terraform 1. uahti fiup bwntyv shayw dxobwf elttv koqb vistvl vfg wezaqf ndbgiydw anawwc pove uxglsoim tmzcg
